{
  "case": "Alderline evidence and human authority",
  "decisions": [
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A01",
        "fictional_name": "Sourcing scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a01",
        "stage": "source",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": true,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "Mandatory company context is absent from the sourcing brief.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a01",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "held",
      "decision": "CONTEXT_HOLD",
      "reason": "Required source or response context is missing."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A02",
        "fictional_name": "Authority inference scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a02",
        "stage": "score",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": false,
        "infer_authority_from_title": true,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "A title alone is being used to infer purchasing authority.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a02",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "held",
      "decision": "AUTHORITY_HOLD",
      "reason": "A title does not establish purchasing authority."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A03",
        "fictional_name": "Unsupported claim scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a03",
        "stage": "reply",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": true,
        "context_missing": false,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "Proposed response promises a commercial outcome without approved supporting evidence.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a03",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "held",
      "decision": "CLAIM_HOLD",
      "reason": "The proposed commercial claim lacks supporting evidence."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A04",
        "fictional_name": "Stop-request scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a04",
        "stage": "reply",
        "stop_request": true,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": false,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "Recipient explicitly asks to stop pitching.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a04",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "excluded",
      "decision": "STOP",
      "reason": "Explicit stop request excludes pitching under this case policy."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A05",
        "fictional_name": "Scheduling scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a05",
        "stage": "reply",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": true,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "Proposed scheduling action lacks approved calendar and availability context.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a05",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "held",
      "decision": "CONTEXT_HOLD",
      "reason": "Required source or response context is missing."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A06",
        "fictional_name": "Simple workflow scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a06",
        "stage": "plan",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": false,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": true,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "One-account campaigns and human inbox handling are sufficient; no AI requirement.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a06",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "accepted",
      "decision": "STARTER_SUFFICIENT",
      "reason": "A simple non-AI campaign/inbox workflow covers this requirement."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A07",
        "fictional_name": "Draft-review scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a07",
        "stage": "reply",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": false,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": false,
        "evidence": "Supported response context and named reviewer are present; only draft review is proposed.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a07",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "accepted",
      "decision": "REVIEW_DRAFT",
      "reason": "Supported context permits the named reviewer to inspect a draft, not an autonomous send."
    },
    {
      "observation": {
        "id": "A08",
        "fictional_name": "Commercial exception scenario",
        "person_key": "fictional-a08",
        "stage": "reply",
        "stop_request": false,
        "unsupported_claim": false,
        "context_missing": false,
        "infer_authority_from_title": false,
        "simple_campaign": false,
        "human_exception": true,
        "evidence": "A commercial exception requires its named human owner, not automatic commitment.",
        "source_url": "https://example.invalid/fictional-a08",
        "do_not_contact": true
      },
      "category": "accepted",
      "decision": "HUMAN_HANDOFF",
      "reason": "The named human owner decides the commercial exception."
    }
  ]
}
