Most teams send one message and stop. The data is unambiguous: a 3-step sequence triples reply rates compared to single sends. Below are tested templates with timing.

The 3-step sequence (most common)

Day 0: Initial DM (after connection acceptance)

Hi {firstName}, thanks for connecting. Quick context: we built {Product} because we got tired of paying $108/mo for {category}. Ours starts at $29/mo, no Sales Nav. Want a 60-sec walkthrough?

Reply rate: 12-15%.

Day 4: Value drop (no reply)

No worries if not relevant. Last note: we wrote up "How to scrape post commenters in 60 seconds (no Sales Nav)". Useful even if you don't try the tool: {link}.

Adds 8-10% to total reply rate.

Day 10: Soft close

{firstName}, last ping. Door's open if {trigger condition} comes up. Best of luck either way.

Adds 4-6% to total reply rate. Often where you get the "actually, we're looking at this now" reply.

The 5-step sequence (higher volume teams)

  1. Day 0: Initial DM with curiosity question (not pitch)
  2. Day 4: Value drop (relevant article or data)
  3. Day 8: Case study or peer reference
  4. Day 14: Direct question ("Worth 10 min or not at all?")
  5. Day 21: Soft close ("I'll stop pinging")

5-step total reply rate: 35-42%.

Timing rules

  • 4-day gaps optimize without feeling spammy.
  • Send Tuesday-Thursday, 9-11am local time of the recipient.
  • Never send on weekends. Reply rates drop 60%.
  • If they reply at any step, drop the sequence and write a custom reply.
i
Diminishing returns: Step 6+ adds 1-2% reply rate but burns goodwill. 5 messages is the safe ceiling. After step 5, pause for 60 days before reattempting.

What kills sequences

  • Re-pitching the same ask in different words (recipients see through it)
  • Increasing pressure ("Last chance!" "Closing soon!")
  • Generic templates without personalization variables
  • Sending all 5 in one week (too dense)

Sequences run automatically with Lead4Linked.

Multi-step LinkedIn campaigns from Pro tier. 100 free leads on signup.

Start free